International Construction Law Review
ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARDS IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
CORINNE TAY1
B Sc (Hons), M Sc, Graduate Diploma in Law Legal Practice Course Student at The College of Law
1. INTRODUCTION
Since the 1950s, arbitration has been the preferred means of dispute resolution in the PRC. To the Chinese, it is perceived to be less adversarial than litigation, because they are influenced by Confucian values to settle matters amicably through moral and ethical principles rather than through law and punishment.2 Moreover, they believe that to lose a litigated case would lead to a loss of face and reputation with business associates.3 To a foreign investor, arbitration offers many advantages over litigation. Most importantly, an award is enforceable across borders because the PRC is a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards of 1958.4 But on a more practical level, arbitration provides an alternative to interpreting Chinese law and following its sometimes inconsistent court judgments.
Whilst the PRC boasts that it has the busiest arbitration centre5 in the world, enforcement of awards in the PRC is a serious problem. Anecdotal evidence suggests that, historically, only 20–50% of international awards are enforced in the PRC.6 This paper is concerned with the practical problems and legal difficulties that exist in the enforcement of arbitral awards in the
1 The author is very grateful to both His Honour Humphrey LLoyd, QC, and Mr John Marrin, QC, for their comments during the preparation of this paper. This paper won the Best Dissertation Award on the MSc degree in Construction Law and Dispute Resolution at King’s College London in January 2008.
2 “The government enforce order by love and virtue (li) so as to reform people’s mindset. By doing so, they create mutual respect amongst the people. Punishment by law (fa) is a secondary mechanism to assist the government in reforming the people.” Confucius, The Analects of Confucius; Jin-fan Zhang, Humanism—A Kind of Characteristic of Chinese Legal Genealogy.
3 Some say that the act of participation in litigation is an admission of some wrongdoing.
4 On 22 January 1987, the PRC ratified the New York Convention. It was given effect by two instruments: (i) The Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on China Joining the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1986), and (ii) The Supreme People’s Court Notice on the Implementation of China’s Accession to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1987).
5 The China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC); statistics counted by Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre: www.hkiac.org_HKIAC/HKIACEnglish/main.html (visited on 10 September 2008).
6 See David Brynmor Thomas and Alastair Henderson, “Arbitration in Asia” (2006) Legal Business Arbitration Report (Herbert Smith) at 1.
[2009
The International Construction Law Review
208