Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly
The Bunker Pollution Convention 2001: completing and harmonizing the liability regime for oil pollution from ships?
Michael N. Tsimplis *
The International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage 2001 is the final piece in the puzzle of Conventions concerning oil pollution from ships. It establishes strict liability for a number of persons concerned with the ownership or the operation of the vessel coupled with compulsory insurance for the owner and direct action against the insurer. The Convention does not affect any right of limitation of liability established in national legislation or by international Conventions, although it does give a clear suggestion to Parties that the Protocol of 1996 to the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 1976 (‘‘LLMC 1996’’) provides the best background for its application. While the Convention applies to all ships, compulsory insurance is established only for the registered owner of ships larger than 1,000 tons gross. The amount for which compulsory insurance is required is that corresponding to the limits of liability available to the shipowner under applicable national law. Thus, in States Parties where no general limitation of liability is available to the shipowner, the strict liability established by the Convention and the required compulsory insurance would, presumably, have to be unlimited.
1. Introduction
The International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage 2001 (hereinafter ‘‘BOPC’’)1
was developed2
as a preventive measure for the reduction and control of pollution of the marine environment3
as well as a mechanism providing compensation for damage caused by pollution of the marine environment.4
The rationale for the development of another pollution Convention was the lack of international legislation covering bunker pollution damage coupled with the ability of even small quantities of most types of fuel oils to cause significant pollution damage and to incur high clean-up costs.5
* Senior Lecturer in Law and Ocean Sciences, Institute of Maritime Law, University of Southampton. I am grateful to Johanna Hjalmarsson for proof reading and editing the final version of this paper. A short version of this paper was presented at the 5th International Conference on Maritime Law, organized by the Piraeus Bar Association in September 2002.
1. Adopted on 23 March 2001 in London. Closed to signature on 30 September 2002.
2. See the Preamble to the Convention.
3. Within the framework of LOSC 1982, Art 194.
4. In accordance with LOSC 1982, Art 235. See also the submission by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) (LEG 79/6/3).
5. Australian data indicate that between 1975 and 1995 78% of the response costs of the Australian national plan are related to bunker oil-spills (LEG/74/2). See also the report annexed to LEG/74/2 by the International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation Ltd, where the potential of damage from relatively small quantities (ie, a few hundred tons) of bunker oil is recognized and documented. See also LEG 75/5/1, where the group of countries pushing for the development of BOPC have gathered factual arguments.
83