Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly
Anticipatory breach of contract—the PRC system and English comparisons
Jay Jie Ze *
The English doctrine of anticipatory breach provides that, if, before the agreed time for performance has arrived, a party renounces the contract or disables himself from performing it, the other party is entitled to treat the contract as at an end and claim damages at once. The doctrine has established itself for reasons of certainty and convenience at the expense of coherent legal reasoning. In recognition of at least its practical values, the recently promulgated
PRC Contract Law introduces to the PRC legal system this doctrine in the form of express and implied anticipatory breach. In addition, the
PRC Contract Law retains the civil law concept of the defence of insecurity. The aim is to provide comprehensive and sound solutions to the problem of renunciation or disablement of performance of a contract before the performance falls due. This paper evaluates the conceptual and practical difficulties surrounding the doctrine, compares the solutions given by both systems to the question of ‘‘anticipatory breach’’, examines their effectiveness, and proposes possible reforms to both systems.
I. INTRODUCTION
Assume A enters into a contract with B. Before the performance is due from B, B refuses to perform the contract either expressly or by conduct, or is unable to perform the contract due to his own act or default. A problem then arises: does A have any immediate right or cause of action before any actual breach by B occurs?
253