Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly
FROM NOAH’S ARK TO MOBILE DRILLING UNITS
Global Marine Drilling
v. Triton Holdings
The Scottish courts appear again to be adding to the clarification of statutory definitions in maritime matters. Though a question of note recently before them may be stated in simple terms, the decision in the case of Global Marine Drilling Co.
v. Triton Holdings Ltd
1
is of fundamental importance. Does a mobile offshore drilling unit fall within the definition of “ship” such as to allow arrestment? Lawyers in this field may now benefit, and creditors of the owners and charterers of such assets now rest assured, following the issue of a written opinion addressing this matter, upon which there is little if any specific dicta.
The semi-submersible drilling rig Sovereign Explorer
was arrested at Invergordon, Scotland in security for claims in a London arbitration. The defender sought recall of the arrestment inter alia
as incompetent, the Sovereign Explorer,
it said, not being a ship.
In Scotland the definition of “ship” for the purposes of arrest is found in the Administration of Justice Act 1956, s. 48. This section is based on the 1952 International Convention Relating to the Arrest of Sea-Going Ships, and “ship” is stated to “include
LLOYD’S MARITIME AND COMMERCIAL LAW QUARTERLY
300