International Construction Law Review
CORRESPONDENTS’ REPORTS: ENGLAND AND WALES
ANDREW TWEEDDALE, HILARY SHEEN AND MARTIN BRIDGEWATER
Norton Rose, London
INTRODUCTION
Over the past year there have been significant changes in the way that costs in litigation are being dealt with by the courts that are highly relevant to construction disputes where the costs can be large. Recent statistics show that the amount of recoverable costs that a party can expect to receive if successful in litigation is dropping. In this Report we mainly examine recent case law affecting costs. We then look at the rise in alternative dispute resolution, and in particular at mediation which increasingly is becoming a mandatory requirement before the court will permit a party to proceed to full litigation. We then consider recent case law affecting other aspects of the construction industry in the United Kingdom, and in particular we focus on adjudication which has now become the main method of resolving construction disputes in the UK. However we begin with some brief notes on the JCT Major Project Form 2003 and the new Construction Industry Council forms of collateral warranty and novation agreement and the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998.
JCT MAJOR PROJECT FORM 2003
This new form of contract was released on 23 June 2003. It is aimed at use on large-scale projects and will provide an additional lump sum contract alongside the well-established JCT98 Standard Form of Building Contract and the JCT98 Standard Form of Building Contract With Contractor’s Design (“WCD98”).
The Major Project Form contains numerous innovations. For example, it is the first JCT form to dispense with retentions and to replace collateral warranties with third party rights under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. In some areas it requires the contractor to carry more risk than WCD98, for example, in respect of ground conditions, the more restricted extension of time provisions and the general obligation to comply with all employer instructions. However, other important new clauses favour the contractor, such as the bonus for early completion, the provisions relating to cost savings and value improvements, and mediation.
[2003
The International Construction Law Review
528