Rules of Evidence in International Arbitration
Page 237
CHAPTER 8
Evidentiary hearing
Introduction
8.01 In the vast majority of international arbitrations, the balance of the evidence will be taken before holding an evidentiary hearing. The exchange of documents, submission of fact witness statements, and expert reports will often be submitted over the course of the arbitration, before a scheduled hearing is held. 8.02 From the standpoint of taking evidence, a hearing is often the place where the record is both challenged and refined through the questioning of witnesses. Usually arbitrators will attempt to avoid raising new issues and/or allegations at the hearing by insisting that the parties refrain from last minute submissions of new evidence, whether it be witness statements or documents. It is often the intention that the parties and the tribunal will come to a hearing well versed in the issues and evidence, so that the scheduled time will be spent honing in on the important questions left to be answered.1 8.03 The approach set forth above leads to the fact that a hearing in international arbitration often takes on different characteristics to one held in domestic legal systems. For instance, the practice of international arbitration has developed so that the predominant purpose of the evidentiary hearing is not to hear the direct testimony of witnesses and experts, but rather to allow for the questioning of witnesses and experts by the tribunal and/or the adverse party. Thus, the hours spent on direct examination of witnesses and experts in the courtrooms of common law jurisdictions is avoided in international arbitration. Also, whereas in some civil law jurisdictions the judge will take the leading role in questioning witnesses and experts, in the modern practice of arbitration it is the counsel who will do most of the questioning of witnesses and experts. 8.04 Of course there are exceptions; nevertheless, the rules set forth in article 8 generally support the above described practices. The following chapter considers these issues and the other questions which arise in regard to the organisation and conduct of an evidentiary hearing.Page 238
Notification of witnesses and the right to a hearing
Article 8.1 2010 IBA Rules: | Within the time ordered by the Arbitral Tribunal, each Party shall inform the Arbitral Tribunal and the other Parties of the witnesses whose appearance it requests. Each witness (which term includes, for the purposes of this Article, witnesses of fact and any experts) shall, subject to Article 8.2, appear for testimony at the Evidentiary Hearing if such person’s appearance has been requested by any Party or by the Arbitral Tribunal. Each witness shall appear in person unless the Arbitral Tribunal allows the use of videoconference or similar technology with respect to a particular witness. |
Other Statements of the Rule | |
Article 24(1) UNCITRAL | Subject to any contrary agreement by the parties, the arbitral tribunalModel Law: shall decide whether to hold oral hearings for the presentation of evidence or for oral argument, or whether the proceedings shall be conducted on the basis of documents and other materials. However, unless the parties have agreed that no hearings shall be held, the arbitral tribunal shall hold such hearings at an appropriate stage of the proceedings, if so requested by a party. |
General discussion
8.05 Practically speaking, an evidentiary hearing may not always be required. Given the extent to which written submissions are used in international arbitration, it is quite possible that a tribunal will be able to adequately decide the matter without oral witness testimony. Nevertheless, the parties, or even the arbitrators, will often seek to hold an evidentiary hearing for the purpose of hearing witnesses. Article 8.1 therefore presupposes that the tribunal has informed the parties of the respective dates for the hearing, and imposed deadlines by which notice of the witnesses expected to attend the hearing should be given. The above notwithstanding, whether a party has a right to a hearing, and, if so, who may call the witnesses, as well as whether the witness must appear in person (as opposed to via video-conference) are all questions which may arise, and are addressed below.Right to a hearing
8.06 The position historically adopted in international arbitration is that an oral hearing should generally be afforded to the parties in the event that it is requested.2 This practice is reflected in many of the well-known procedural rules as well as in the Model Law.3 ThePage 239
Page 240
Page 241
WFT did not file a request for Hearing by the 18 February 1987 deadline established by the Tribunal’s Order filed 4 August 1986. Eleven months after the deadline, however, WFT requested a Hearing. Article 15(2) of the Tribunal Rules … states that a party may request a Hearing at “any stage of the proceedings”. This provision should be interpreted, in the light of the particular circumstances of the case, to mean that hearings are to be held upon the reasonable request of a party made at an appropriate stage of the proceedings. The Tribunal determines that, in light of all the circumstances of this Case, WFT having failed to request a Hearing within the deadline set by the Tribunal’s Order, WFT’s request is not reasonable or appropriate at this stage. Therefore the Tribunal will decide the remaining jurisdictional issues and the merits on the basis of the documents that have been submitted without holding a Hearing.12